#5501 - Group language fluency
This is a spacer post for a website comment topic. The content this topic relates to: #5501 - Group language fluency
By Guest
posted
Yeah, I agree we need to be more consistent. I'll make the change, thank you.
By Guest
posted
I'm deferring this issue to a later patch release. It will require careful code / performance consideration.
By Guest
posted
It's just removing Staff from the "your application will be validated" text on the initial group screen. The next screen is then not confusing as it lists both staff/usergroup leader may validate.
By Guest
posted
The way the language strings are used / decided on in the module is a bit more complex than what appears. I'm debating whether it's better to follow your suggestion and just use a generic "your application will be reviewed", or if it should specify the group leader (or "staff" if there is none) as it does when applying for a usergroup. Ideally, I want to do the latter as it is the most consistent, but it would require special considerations in the code because it doesn't currently load in group leader information for that screen (thus it would be a slight performance hit to do it).
By Guest
posted
Okay, I just wanted to make it clearer what I meant as I know I can sometimes be vague or open to interpretation.
0 guests and 0 members have recently viewed this.

