#3728 - Missing *
| Identifier | #3728 |
|---|---|
| Issue type | Feature request or suggestion |
| Title | Missing * |
| Status | Closed (rejected) |
| Handling member | Chris Graham |
| Addon | catalogues |
| Description | Very minor thing but the Yes/No checkbox on catalogues isn't showing the red asterisk when set as a required field. |
| Steps to reproduce | |
| Funded? | No |
The system will post a comment when this issue is modified (e.g., status changes). To be notified of this, click "Enable comment notifications".


Comments
You can see neither show as required on the form. The first is implicitly required, there's no way for it to not be set. The second obviously won't show as required due to being set non-required.
I agree it's inconsistent, but I do think it's the right way to do it. I've added a note about this in tut_fields.
I could conceive of another interpretation of 'required' where you have to check the checkbox (tick the tickbox). That would be used for declarations. I don't think that's something catalogue fields should support though.
(Click to enlarge)