#2470 - (unnamed) unnecessary
-
By Adam Edington
- Added
- 2 views
| Identifier | #2470 |
|---|---|
| Issue type | Feature request or suggestion |
| Title | (unnamed) unnecessary |
| Status | Closed (rejected) |
| Handling member | Chris Graham |
| Addon | General / Uncategorised |
| Description | I do apologise if I sometimes repeat myself, not sure what I've said out loud and what I've thought. There are several instances where (unnamed) is a placeholder the website name, but I don't think it's needed in a lot of them. There's not many websites I visit that include their website name in page names (as most people are aware where they are). It makes sense in the copyright notice and perhaps even the sitemap, but not on 'The (unnamed) staff' where most sites would just use Staff, Team or Our Staff. Also not needed on Rules, Recommend and several other pages.
Haven't looked at every instance, noticed a fair few and it kind of niggles me. Just a tad though, so if you don't agree I can live with it (cos I can change it). |
| Steps to reproduce | |
| Funded? | No |
The system will post a comment when this issue is modified (e.g., status changes). To be notified of this, click "Enable comment notifications".
Comments
Your thinking of cases of a website being a standalone entity with its own clear staffing, but it's not always like this. Organisations may have a website with a particular group of people managing that site - so it needs to be clear that those listed are the staff of the site, not the organisation. The specificity makes it apply correctly to the largest group of sites in my opinion.
Another reason it makes some sense is that some sites have a name (like mine Surfrenzy) but I put Surfrenzy Network in the copyright and other places. I don't want to call my site Sufrenzy Network though, just as one example.
I know this can be changed by editing the pages. I am working on the out-of-the-box experience. Admins could just as easily edit their website name into the page titles.