We apologize for the instability of composr.app and appreciate your patience. We are working on the statistics addon and trying to find an optimal way to store and render data. Unfortunately, we have yet to find a solution that can handle the traffic (and therefore, tens of millions of statistical records) of composr.app. We're working hard on one.
I'd need to see a good argument for why galleries need to be sortable, and what they would be sorted by.
The only orders I can think of are the order the gallery owner wants, and the title order. That's not a lot of scope for sorting, and galleries aren't really title-based anyway, they're generally browsed visually.
This isn't related to catalogues though. Downloads and Galleries are not catalogues, catalogues don't provide any kind of special functionality and are their own thing.
The only orders I can think of are the order the gallery owner wants, and the title order. That's not a lot of scope for sorting, and galleries aren't really title-based anyway, they're generally browsed visually.
This isn't related to catalogues though. Downloads and Galleries are not catalogues, catalogues don't provide any kind of special functionality and are their own thing.