I was just considering this. HTTPS should be secure. If HTTPS is broken then the webmaster has big problems.
If the user relies on this, well they can't, because what if the remote content changes due to some non-security-related reason? So really they have to understand what they are doing, in which case there's no point of this feature.
If the user relies on this, well they can't, because what if the remote content changes due to some non-security-related reason? So really they have to understand what they are doing, in which case there's no point of this feature.